In the era of data-driven decisions, companies around the globe are focusing more on key performance indicators (KPIs) to analyze, control, and improve their spend management processes. This article explores the top 20 spend management KPIs that global businesses should track to optimize their procurement functions and realize cost savings.
In the era of data-driven decisions, companies around the globe are focusing more on key performance indicators (KPIs) to analyze, control, and improve their spend management processes. This article explores the top 20 spend management KPIs that global businesses should track to optimize their procurement functions and realize cost savings.
Cost avoidance, sometimes referred to as "soft savings" is just as important as increasing revenues when it comes to profitability. By reducing extra costs and avoiding unnecessary expenses, businesses can increase their profits. Cost avoidance is a way of looking at how to reduce future costs without sacrificing the quality of the product or service. It involves examining existing expenditures and determining where savings can be made without affecting the customer experience or compromising on quality.
"Procurement plays a pivotal role in shaping a company's success by unlocking cost savings, mitigating risks, and driving operational excellence across the supply chain." - Jermaine Jackson, Partner: Procurement - Zanovoy
For instance, businesses can implement process automation and streamline their purchasing processes. This reduces the time and effort required to complete a purchase, resulting in cost savings. Additionally, businesses can negotiate better terms with suppliers and vendors to get lower prices on raw materials and other items they often buy, with a complete list of variables that can impact the actual costs of orders.
Spend Under Management (SUM) is a Key Performance Indicator for businesses striving for efficient spend management. It quantifies the proportion of the total spend that is effectively managed by the procurement function.
To calculate SUM, divide the total spend under management by the total spend of the company and multiply by 100.
A high SUM indicates effective management of company expenses. The procurement function, through strategic methods, has a firm control over a larger portion of the company's expenditures. This can translate into better negotiation power, economies of scale, and reduced costs.
On the other hand, a low SUM may expose potential risks. It could imply that a significant part of the company's expenses is not being effectively controlled. This may result in inefficiencies, unauthorized spending, and missed opportunities for savings.
Keeping track of SUM allows businesses to assess the performance of their procurement functions. It enables them to identify areas that need improvement and devise strategies to boost spend management controls and cost efficiency.
The Cost Savings Key Performance Indicator (KPI) holds a prominent position within the realm of spend management. This valuable metric signifies the amount of money that a business manages to save through effective implementation of various spend management strategies. These strategies could range from negotiating improved prices with suppliers to implementing processes that minimize waste.
Cost savings is calculated as the difference between total spend and actual spend, divided by the total spend, all multiplied by 100 to obtain the percentage of savings. This can be expressed as:
A higher percentage in cost savings indicates the efficiency of the procurement department's cost-saving efforts. These can range from successful price negotiations with suppliers to process improvements that reduce waste or enhance productivity.
Conversely, lower cost savings could signify missed opportunities to save costs or inefficiencies in the procurement processes. It could potentially highlight areas where further negotiation or process improvements are needed.
Monitoring cost savings aids businesses in determining the effectiveness of their spend management strategies. It supports them in identifying successful cost-saving measures and recognizing areas that need further optimization. Ultimately, focusing on increasing cost savings can significantly improve a company's bottom line and overall financial health.
"Effective procurement is not just about securing the best deal; it's about building strong, strategic partnerships with suppliers to drive long-term value and innovation." - Jermaine Jackson, Partner: Procurement - Zanovoy
The Purchase Order Cycle Time is an essential Key Performance Indicator (KPI) in the realm of procurement. This metric provides a gauge of the time required to issue and process a purchase order, which, in turn, offers insights into the efficiency of the company's procurement process.
The calculation of PO Cycle Time involves subtracting the date goods or services were received from the date the PO was issued and dividing by the number of POs issued:
A short PO cycle time suggests that a company's procurement process is efficient and well-structured. This could translate into better relationships with suppliers, as orders are processed promptly.
However, a longer PO cycle time may indicate inefficiencies in the procurement process. This could result in delayed deliveries and potential disruptions in the company's operations.
By tracking PO Cycle Time, businesses can identify bottlenecks in their procurement process and implement measures to streamline order processing, thereby improving overall operational efficiency.
The Spend By Category KPI is a pivotal metric in procurement that provides a comprehensive understanding of a company's financial distribution across distinct business categories. Whether it's Information Technology (IT), marketing, facilities, human resources (HR), or any other business sector, this KPI offers valuable insight into the proportion of total spend allocated to each department.
This KPI is calculated by dividing the spend in a specific category by the total spend.
By monitoring this KPI, a business can gain insights into where most of its expenditure goes, allowing for better budget planning and allocation.
A high spend in a single category might indicate the need for cost reduction strategies within that sector or an opportunity to negotiate better deals with suppliers.
Tracking Spend By Category helps businesses optimize their procurement strategies, identify potential areas for savings, and make informed decisions about budget allocation.
The Spend By Supplier KPI is a valuable metric that provides insight into the distribution of a company's spend across its various suppliers. It allows procurement teams to understand how their expenditures are allocated among different preferred suppliers and assess their relationships, as well as understand trends in purchase price variance, average cost of an order by supplier and average orders over a period of time.
This KPI is calculated by dividing the spend with a particular supplier by the total spend
Keeping track of Spend By Supplier helps companies manage their supplier relationships more effectively, enabling them to identify key suppliers and ensure strategic allocation of resources.
A high spend with a single supplier might suggest over-dependence on that supplier, exposing the company to potential supply chain risks.
Monitoring this KPI aids businesses in optimizing their supplier management strategy, negotiating better contracts, and reducing risk associated with supplier dependence.
Contract compliance is crucial for ensuring that suppliers fulfill their contractual obligations, which directly impacts the company's operational efficiency, cost control, and overall business performance. By monitoring contract compliance, organizations can mitigate risks, strengthen supplier relationships, and drive value creation.
The Contract Compliance rate is calculated as follows:
A high contract compliance rate indicates that suppliers are delivering as per the agreed terms, which can result in smooth operations and fewer disputes.
On the contrary, a low contract compliance rate could signal potential issues with suppliers, which may disrupt operations and lead to additional costs.
By keeping an eye on this KPI, businesses can ensure their suppliers meet their contractual obligations and manage supplier relationships more effectively.
Supplier Lead Time represents the duration between the moment an order is placed with a supplier and the subsequent delivery time of goods or completion of services. It encompasses the entire process, from order placement to receipt of the ordered items.
This is calculated as the sum of total order lead times divided by the total number of orders
A shorter supplier lead time is desirable as it implies quicker deliveries, less inventory holding costs, and reduced risk of stockouts.
However, longer lead times could increase inventory costs, disrupt operations, and affect customer satisfaction.
Monitoring this KPI helps businesses manage their inventory more effectively, negotiate better lead times with suppliers, and improve their supply chain efficiency.
The Savings Per Supplier KPI is a calculated metric that enables organizations to quantify the amount of money saved through negotiations or cost-saving measures implemented with specific vendors. It sheds light on the cost efficiencies achieved by optimizing vendor relationships and procurement strategies.
Savings per supplier is calculated as the baseline spend minus the actual spend
This KPI allows companies to identify which vendors are providing the most cost-effective deals and contribute to significant annual cost savings.
Low savings per supplier might indicate the need for improved negotiation strategies or a review of the supplier’s contract.
By tracking this KPI, businesses can refine their supplier negotiations and pricing strategies to drive further savings and improve profitability.
Invoice accuracy refers to the level of correctness and precision in the invoices received by a company. It assesses the extent to which invoices align with the agreed-upon terms and accurately reflect the goods or services provided. It assesses the extent to which invoices align with the agreed-upon terms and accurately reflect the goods or services provided.
The Invoice Accuracy Rate is calculated as the number of accurate invoices divided by the total number of invoices, multiplied by 100.
High invoice accuracy reduces administrative time spent on resolving invoice discrepancies and improves the overall efficiency of the procurement process.
Low invoice accuracy could lead to discrepancies, disputes, and delays in payments, which could impact supplier relationships and overall operational efficiency.
Monitoring this KPI helps businesses identify potential issues in the invoicing process, take corrective action, and streamline their procurement operations.
Spend visibility refers to the ability of an organization to clearly see and understand its spending patterns, distribution, and trends across various categories and suppliers. It encompasses the visibility of spend data, including detailed information on purchases, categories, suppliers, and associated costs..
Spend visibility is calculated as the tracked spend divided by the total spend, multiplied by 100.
A high spend visibility allows businesses to analyze their expenditure in detail, identify trends, and make data-driven decisions.
Low spend visibility could lead to inefficiencies, uncontrolled spend, and missed opportunities for savings.
By improving spend visibility, businesses can enhance their spend management, identify cost-saving opportunities, and improve procurement efficiency.
"In today's dynamic business landscape, procurement professionals must embrace digitalization and data-driven insights to make informed decisions, optimize processes, and deliver sustainable value to their organizations." - Jermaine Jackson, Partner: Procurement - Zanovoy
Procurement Cycle Time represents the duration from the moment a need is identified within the organization to the point when the requested goods or services are received. It encompasses various stages, including requisition creation, supplier selection, order placement, and delivery.
This KPI is calculated as the date goods or services are received subtracted from the date the purchase requisition was created
A shorter procurement cycle time signifies an efficient procurement process, which can lead to quicker deliveries, lower inventory costs, and improved customer satisfaction.
A longer procurement cycle time, however, could lead to delays, higher costs, and potential disruptions in operations.
Monitoring this KPI enables businesses to identify bottlenecks in their procurement process, streamline their operations, and improve efficiency.
The Maverick Spending KPI is a crucial Key Performance Indicator (KPI) for companies aiming to control expenditure that falls outside the standard procurement processes or guidelines. Maverick Spend refers to the unauthorized or uncontrolled spending that occurs when employees bypass established procurement procedures.
Maverick Spend Rate is calculated by dividing the maverick spend by the total company spend and then multiplying by 100.
Monitoring Maverick Spend is essential because high rates can indicate a lack of adherence to procurement policies. This could lead to higher costs, inefficiencies, and potential loss of strategic control.
A high Maverick Spend rate could point towards weak enforcement of procurement procedures, which might lead to unauthorized purchases, non-compliant supplier selection, and missed opportunities for consolidated purchasing and volume discounts.
By keeping track of Maverick Spend, companies can pinpoint where their procurement policies are not being followed and take corrective action. Strategies can include internal training, process simplification, or the introduction of an e-procurement system or spend management software to make adherence easier.
The Contract Utilization KPI measures the extent to which a company's procurement contracts are being leveraged and utilized effectively. It provides insights into how well the organization is utilizing the contracts it has established with suppliers. This metric helps organizations determine if the negotiated terms and conditions, pricing, and supplier relationships are being fully leveraged to drive cost savings, improve efficiencies, and manage supplier relationships.
The Contract Utilization Rate is computed by dividing the amount spent under contract by the total contract value and then multiplying by 100.
A high Contract Utilization rate indicates that the company is maximizing the value of its contracts, achieving economies of scale, and managing spend efficiently.
On the other hand, a low Contract Utilization rate might suggest underutilization of contracts, potential inefficiencies, and missed savings opportunities. It could also indicate non-compliance with contract terms, leading to increased maverick spend and contractual disputes.
Monitoring Contract Utilization helps companies identify opportunities to consolidate spend under existing contracts and negotiate better terms with suppliers. This KPI can also support supplier performance management by revealing suppliers that consistently deliver value and those that do not.
The Payment Terms KPI reflects the time period that a company has to pay its suppliers after receiving goods or services. Payment Terms refer to the agreed-upon conditions between a company and its suppliers regarding the payment timeline for goods or services received. This should be clearly visible in most procurement reports. These terms specify the number of days or a specific date by which payment should be made.
The Average Payment Term in days is determined by dividing the sum of payment terms by the total number of contracts.
This KPI is significant as it can help companies manage their cash flow more effectively by indicating the time they have to settle supplier payments. It also provides insights into supplier relationships, as shorter payment terms might signal strong supplier bargaining power or low buyer creditworthiness.
Longer payment terms could potentially strain supplier relationships and affect the company's reputation. In contrast, shorter payment terms could put pressure on a company's liquidity.
By tracking Payment Terms, companies can negotiate more favorable terms with their suppliers, optimize their working capital, and potentially improve supplier relationships.
The Spend Per Employee KPI offers valuable insights into the company's spending patterns and resource allocation. It helps organizations understand the efficiency of their procurement processes, identify potential areas for cost optimization, and evaluate the impact of expenditures on overall operational performance.
This KPI is calculated by dividing the total company spend by the total number of employees.
A lower Spend Per Employee ratio could suggest efficient cost management and resource allocation. It provides a snapshot of how well a company leverages its human resources in relation to its overall expenditure.
Conversely, a higher Spend Per Employee ratio may indicate inefficiencies, suggesting a need for better resource management or cost control.
By tracking Spend Per Employee, businesses can identify potential areas of cost reduction or efficiency gains. It can also help in strategic decision-making about resource allocation, workforce planning, and procurement process optimization.
The Procurement ROI KPI plays a crucial role in assessing the value and impact of the procurement function within an organization. It provides insights into the financial benefits generated through cost savings, supplier management, and process optimization. It also quantifies the return on the investment made in procurement activities and strategies.
This KPI is calculated as the difference between cost savings and procurement costs divided by procurement costs.
A higher Procurement ROI indicates a more effective procurement function, demonstrating that the department is adding value to the company by reducing costs.
However, a lower Procurement ROI could suggest that procurement operations are costing more than they are saving, implying a need for strategic reassessment.
By monitoring Procurement ROI, companies can evaluate the efficiency of their procurement activities, identify areas for improvement, and devise strategies to enhance cost savings and value creation.
Supplier Diversity refers to the intentional effort made by a company to engage and work with suppliers that represent a broad range of backgrounds, including minority-owned, women-owned, veteran-owned, and other underrepresented groups. It aims to create opportunities, drive economic growth, and foster a diverse business ecosystem.
The Supplier Diversity ratio is calculated by dividing the number of suppliers identified as "diverse" by the total number of suppliers.
A high Supplier Diversity ratio suggests a commitment to inclusivity and social responsibility. It can also provide access to a broader range of ideas, products, and services, fostering innovation and competitive advantage.
A low Supplier Diversity ratio may imply a narrow supplier base, potentially limiting access to innovative solutions and reflecting poorly on a company's corporate social responsibility profile.
Tracking Supplier Diversity can assist companies in diversifying their supplier base, thereby promoting inclusivity and sustainability, and possibly gaining a competitive edge in the marketplace.
"Supplier diversity is not just about meeting quotas; it's about embracing inclusivity and leveraging the unique perspectives and capabilities of a diverse supplier base to drive innovation and create a competitive advantage." - Jermaine Jackson, Partner: Procurement - Zanovoy
The Supplier Risk Key Performance Indicator (KPI) is a crucial metric that assesses the potential risk associated with a supplier that may cause disruption or harm to a company's operations or reputation. It enables organizations to proactively manage and mitigate risks associated with their supplier relationships. By monitoring and evaluating supplier risks, organizations can identify vulnerabilities and take proactive measures to mitigate potential disruptions or reputational damage.
Supplier Risk is calculated by summing the product of the weight of a risk category and a supplier's score in that category.
A higher Supplier Risk score may indicate a higher potential for disruption, making it a critical factor for organizations to consider when selecting and managing suppliers, as this can impact the overall cost of procurement across the entire business.
Conversely, a lower Supplier Risk score suggests a more reliable and stable supplier, leading to smoother operations and less potential for unforeseen disruptions.
By monitoring the Supplier Risk KPI, companies can make informed decisions about which suppliers to work with and manage potential supply risk proactively, contributing to a more robust supply chain.
The Sustainability Key Performance Indicator (KPI) is a metric that evaluates the degree to which a company's procurement processes and practices promote environmental sustainability. It assesses the company's commitment to minimizing its ecological footprint and adopting sustainable practices throughout its supply chain.
Sustainability is calculated by summing the product of the weight of a sustainability indicator and the score for that indicator.
A higher Sustainability score reflects a company's commitment to sustainable and responsible procurement practices, which can enhance its corporate image and contribute to its overall sustainability goals.
On the other hand, a lower Sustainability score might suggest a need for improvement in the company's procurement processes to better align with environmental sustainability practices.
Tracking the Sustainability KPI can help companies identify areas for improvement in their procurement processes, align their practices with sustainability goals, and demonstrate their commitment to responsible business practices.
Contract Value refers to the monetary worth of a contract established between a company and its supplier. It encompasses the financial obligations, commitments, and terms outlined in the contract, such as the unit price, actual quantity required, and any additional costs specified. The Contract Value KPI plays a crucial role in understanding the financial impact and scale of supplier contracts within the company's procurement activities. It enables organizations to assess the magnitude of their contractual relationships and evaluate the potential benefits, risks, and implications associated with these agreements.
Contract value is calculated by multiplying the unit price by the quantity and then adding any additional costs associated with the contract.
Understanding the contract value is crucial for managing procurement budgets, assessing supplier relationships, and evaluating the cost-effectiveness of a contract.
A high Contract Value may suggest a significant relationship with a supplier, whereas a lower value contract might be a target for further negotiation or supplier diversification.
Keeping track of Contract Value can provide businesses with actionable insights into their spending patterns, assisting in budgeting, supplier management, and strategic procurement decision-making.
The modern procurement function is not just about buying goods and services. It's a strategic arm of an organization, directly influencing financial health, operational efficiency, and overall business success. A key enabler in this strategic role is the understanding and use of Spend Management Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). These procurement KPIs help procurement leaders comprehend the larger implications of their daily decisions.
Spend Management KPIs like the examples above, are quantitative measures that a procurement organization can use to evaluate and improve their strategies, processes, and activities. These metrics cover a broad range of areas, including cost savings, spend visibility, supplier performance, and risk management, among others.
For instance, the Spend Under Management (SUM) KPI indicates the percentage of an organization's spend that is managed by the procurement team. It sheds light on the extent of control the procurement function has over spending at the organizational level.
Every decision that a procurement professional makes impacts various spend management KPIs. For instance, negotiating better contract terms with suppliers affects the Cost Savings KPI, while selecting suppliers based on factors other than actual price influences the Supplier Diversity KPI. Depending on the organization's goals, monitoring and adjusting strategies based on the trends shown in these procurement KPIs will go a long way towards helping the business achieve its goals and targets.
Every purchasing decision has broader implications for the organization. Enhanced cost savings contribute to the organization's bottom line, while improved supplier diversity can foster innovation, enhance brand reputation, and ensure supply chain resilience.
As another example, the Maverick Spend KPI, which measures spending outside of approved procurement processes, can alert organizations to potential risks and inefficiencies of different departments or specific team members.
Procurement teams can leverage these procurement KPIs to make informed, strategic decisions that align with the organization's larger goals. By tracking the Procurement Return on Investment (ROI) KPI, for example, teams can assess the financial efficiency of their procurement activities and identify areas for improvement.
Similarly, by monitoring the Sustainability KPI, organizations can evaluate the environmental impact of their procurement practices. This can guide them in incorporating sustainable practices into their procurement strategy, which can enhance their corporate social responsibility standing and create long-term value.
In a fast-paced and increasingly complex business environment, regular spend management audits are more important than ever. They can shed light on the effectiveness of your procurement strategies, uncover potential risks, and identify opportunities for improvement. We encourage all organizations to incorporate regular spend management audits into their processes, focusing on Spend Management KPIs as key assessment metrics. Use these KPIs as your roadmap to understand the implications of procurement decisions, adapt your strategy, and drive sustainable growth. Remember, the key to efficient spend management lies in informed decision-making, proactive strategy adjustments, and consistent performance tracking. Take the first step today and schedule a comprehensive spend management audit for your organization.
Jermaine Jackson is a seasoned Professional Services Consultant who has carved a niche for himself in the diverse sectors of software, advertising media, publishing, and the services industry.