Implementation & Integration Services
The Implementation Team Your Finance and Procurement Leaders Will Actually Keep Calling

Implementation, integration, and project rescue for the Office of the CFO. We resell licenses for multiple AI-native ERP implementation partners, building the connections between them and the rest of your stack on our integration platform, and we take over the projects that other partners walked away from. One delivery framework, from kickoff through go-live.

Trusted by Industry Leaders

What We Have Seen

Why Implementation Projects Fail. And What We Built To Stop That

Most enterprise software projects do not fail at the platform level. They fail at the seams: between scope and resources, between sales and delivery, between the platform vendor and the integration team, and between go-live and year two. Here is the pattern we keep seeing.

01

THE OVER-SCOPED START, UNDER-STAFFED FINISH

The partner sold the deal at full scope and staffed the delivery for billable hours. Senior consultants ran the pitch; junior consultants ran the project. The platform got configured but never tuned to the close calendar, the audit cycle, or the way your team actually works.

02

THE HANDOFF GAP

Implementation and managed services were provided by two different vendors. The implementation partner walked away the week of go-live. The managed services vendor inherited a configuration they did not build, and your team became the documentation for both.

03

THE MODULE THAT NEVER TURNED ON

You paid for modules that were activated but never configured. CRM, PSA, commerce, planning, and the integration layer. They sit in the contract while your finance team exports data to spreadsheets to do the work that the modules were supposed to do.

04

THE INTEGRATION NOBODY OWNS

The AI-native ERP vendor supports their product. The procurement vendor supports theirs. The connector between them is supported by neither. When the connection breaks, two help desks point at each other, and your AP team manually keys invoices for three weeks while the ticket sits open.

05

THE PROJECT WITH NO INTERNAL OWNER

The platform vendor brought their methodology. You did not have a PMO to govern it. The vendor delivered against their template. The template did not match your business. Six months in, scope creep is the project plan.

Our Services

Scoped To Match The Problem, Not The Template

Implementation projects rarely arrive in the same shape twice. Some need a fresh build. Some need an outside team to take over a project that the original partner could not finish. Some need a project manager who works for you, not for the vendor. And some need an integration layer that the platform vendors have already declined to own. Here is how we engage.

 01. Implementation Services

We deliver against a project plan scoped to your fiscal year and close calendar. SuiteSuccess for NetSuite. Coupa Premier methodology for Coupa. CPA-led delivery for Rillet and Campfire. The platforms are different. The discipline is the same: data integrity, audit trails, control mapping, change management, and a delivery team that is still on the phone in year three.

Typical timeline: 3 to 9 months (NetSuite), 8 to 16 weeks (Coupa), 8 to 12 weeks (Campfire), 4 to 6 weeks (Rillet)

Engagement: Fixed-fee phases

 02. Implementation Rescue

We do not approach rescue projects as a sales opportunity. We approach them as a triage case. The first conversation is a no-cost assessment of the current state: what is configured, what is documented, what is salvageable, and what has to be rebuilt. If the project is recoverable, we scope a recovery plan. If it is not, we will say so and recommend the path forward, even if that is not the engagement you wanted us to sell.
Most of the rescue work we have done is not a net-new implementation. It is a configuration audit, undocumented customization mapping, integration repair, and stabilization of a system that the original partner left half-built. The hard part of a rescue is rarely the platform. It is the inheritance.

Typical timeline: 4 to 12 weeks for stabilization, longer if reconfiguration is needed

Engagement: Time and materials, capped against a stabilization plan

 03. Outsourced Technology PMO

The platform vendor brings a methodology. They do not bring a project manager who works for you. We do. The Outsourced PMO sits on your side of the table, holding the vendor accountable to scope, timeline, budget, and the way your business actually runs. We attend the vendor's status meetings, audit the vendor's deliverables, and translate between the vendor's project plan and your finance, IT, and operations leadership.
We have run this model on engagements where Zanovoy was not the implementation partner. It is sometimes the cleanest way to bring enterprise discipline to a vendor-led project without changing partners mid-project.

Typical timeline: 3 to 12 months, depending on project size

Engagement: Monthly retainer

 04. Integration Services

Vendor support agreements cover individual platforms. They do not cover the connections between platforms. When NetSuite and Coupa do not talk, when your CRM does not sync to your GL, and when your billing platform passes data your revenue recognition engine cannot consume, the gap is operational, and nobody owns it.zConnect is our proprietary iPaaS, built specifically for the integrations the platform vendors have declined to own: ERP-to-procurement handoffs, CRM-to-GL contract syncs, billing-to-rev-rec handoffs, and the dozens of less-glamorous integrations that the modern finance stack depends on. We architect, build, and maintain the connection layer as a discrete service, separate from any individual platform implementation.

Typical timeline: 4 to 8 weeks per integration build

Engagement: Fixed-fee per integration · monthly retainer for ongoing management

 05. Managed Integration as a Service (MiPaaS)

Integrations break. APIs deprecate. Platform versions are updated. Schema changes silently. MiPaaS is the operational layer that keeps the integrations running after they go live: monitoring, alerting, version compatibility maintenance, and on-call response when an integration drops mid-month-end. The same team that built it owns it. The same accountability that delivered the build maintains the connection.

Typical timeline: Monthly retainer per integration

Engagement: Tiered by integration count, complexity, and SLA

One conversation about your current situation. We tell you honestly which of the five engagement models applies and what the right scope looks like before anything is priced.

Tell Us Where Your Project Is

Our Differentiation

Why CFOs Choose Zanovoy for Software Implementation Work

The implementation partner ecosystem is crowded. Most firms either specialize in one platform and charge accordingly or run horizontally across platforms and never develop depth in any one. Here is where we land.

01

Wide Expertise

From data analytics tools to CRM systems, our staff has experience in a wide range of software categories. We have the expertise to guarantee a successful implementation, regardless of your needs.

02

Smooth Process

Implementing software can be difficult and complicated. From initial planning to final distribution, a seamless process is guaranteed by our tried-and-true processes.

03

Risk Mitigation

Implementation risks have the potential to ruin your project and negatively affect your company. Our professionals recognize and reduce these risks to keep your deployment on schedule.

04

Custom Implementation

Every organization has different requirements for implementation. Our services are customized to fit your unique needs, guaranteeing that the software works flawlessly with your business processes.

05

Post-Implementation Support

The implementation is not the end of our work. To guarantee that your new software works flawlessly with your operations and provides the anticipated advantages, we provide continuing support.

Our Process

Four Stages. One Relationship. Continuity Of Accountability From Scope To Steady State

01

ASSESS

Typical: 1-2 weeks.

Current-state review. We map your platforms, integrations, gaps, and the project's actual goal before we scope anything. The assessment ends with a written read of where the project stands and what it actually needs, which may or may not match what you came in asking for.

02

SCOPE & PLAN

Typical: 1-3 weeks.

Fit-gap analysis, module selection, integration architecture, data migration plan, and a project structure scoped to your close calendar and fiscal year, not against a standard template.

03

DELIVER

Typical: 4 weeks to 9 months, depending on platform and scope.

Configuration, data migration, integration build via zConnect, customization, user training, and go-live. The senior consultants who scoped the project stay engaged through delivery as the accountable owners, even when day-to-day implementation moves to the delivery team. Handoffs happen; the accountability does not.

04

MANAGE

Ongoing.

Selection engagements informed by project-based billing complexity, time and materials vs. fixed-fee mix, WIP management, resource utilization tracking, and the margin protection requirements that come with a thin-margin services business.

We map your platforms, integrations, gaps, and the project's actual goal before we scope anything. No commitment beyond the assessment.

Get a Free Implementation Assessment

120+

Professionals on the Financial Transformation Team

80+

Companies supported through IPO

1,000+

 Implementations delivered across 5 continents

200+

Customizations built for enterprise clients

500+

Integrations built across the platform ecosystem

5+

 Continents served

Where We Have Depth

Implementation Discipline Built For Regulated Industries

The vertical you operate in shapes which modules matter, which controls auditors will ask for, and which integrations carry the most risk. Our delivery team has built the configurations, controls, and integrations specific to each.

01

 Life Sciences & Biotech

Roivant, Paragonix, Minerva Neurosciences. GxP, SOX readiness, IPO-track OneWorld consolidation, and FDA validation considerations.

02

Energy, Mining & Utilities

Piedmont Lithium and others. Asset tracking, project accounting, field operations, and capital project reporting.

03

Manufacturing & Distribution

MRP, WIP, and routing, advanced inventory, and work orders. Implementations scoped to shop-floor reality.

04

Professional Services & SaaS

PSA, project accounting, subscription billing, and ASC 606 revenue recognition. For services firms that need the full ERP footprint, not just a billing system.

Proof That Does Not Come From a Sales Deck.

What Our Customers Say After the First Five Years

Renewed managed services for 5 more years
Biotech, NetSuite + Coupa managed services
Zanovoy consistently demonstrates deep technical expertise and a strong understanding of our operational needs. They don't just maintain our systems, they actively look for ways to enhance performance and streamline workflows. Given the strength of this partnership, we renewed for another five years.
David Pieters
VP, Finance & Corporate Controller, Biotheryx
8-year NetSuite + Coupa partnership
Pharmaceutical group, multi-entity finance
Over eight years managing our NetSuite and Coupa environments, Zanovoy has consistently delivered. Their team is highly responsive, detail-oriented, and brings a practical understanding of finance and IT system alignment, helping us evolve and optimize as our business has grown.
Lana breygina
Senior Finance Systems Manager, Roivant
Spend visibility and procurement control
Midstream energy, Coupa implementation
The Zanovoy team brought strong expertise, clear communication, and a practical approach that kept the project moving efficiently. We now have improved visibility into spend, more streamlined procurement, and better control across our operations.
Brent Worthy
CFO, Clearfork Midstream
Reporting, visibility, and controls in one rollout
Midstream energy, NetSuite implementation
Zanovoy demonstrated a deep understanding of our industry from the outset. The implementation was well-structured, transparent, and professionally executed. Since going live, NetSuite has significantly improved our financial visibility, streamlined reporting, and strengthened internal controls.
Catherine Bain
Chief Accounting Officer, Cardinal Midstream
NetSuite + Planning & Budgeting, delivered
Energy/infrastructure, full finance transformation
Zanovoy brought a high level of expertise and structure to the project, ensuring a smooth and efficient implementation. Their team took the time to understand our financial processes and reporting requirements, which resulted in a solution that was well-aligned with our business needs.
Rodrigo Campos
Corporate Controller, Third Coast
Delivered on an accelerated timeline
Oil & gas, NetSuite implementation
Zanovoy was selected for their deep expertise in oil and gas and their track record on accelerated timelines. From day one, the team demonstrated a strong understanding of our industry and operational requirements. The implementation was executed with precision, organization, and efficiency. Overall the speed of delivery consistently exceeded our expectations
Paweł Rozkrut
CFO, Avenir Energy
Stronger finance operations, continuity across systems
Nonprofit, finance systems and process support
Zanovoy provided technical expertise and strategic guidance across our finance systems and processes. Their team demonstrated a strong understanding of our operational needs and delivered with professionalism, responsiveness, and attention to detail. They remained focused on outcomes — helping us improve efficiency, strengthen our financial operations, and ensure continuity across our systems.
Alpha Conteh
CFO, Center for Reproductive Rights
FAQ

Questions Leaders Ask Before Signing

Straight answers. No sales language.
What does an implementation rescue actually involve?
The first conversation is a no-cost assessment of the current state: what is configured, what is documented, what is salvageable, and what has to be rebuilt. If the project is recoverable, we scope a stabilization plan against fixed-fee phases. If the configuration is too far gone, we will say so and recommend whether to reconfigure, reimplement, or change platforms entirely. Most rescues we deliver involve configuration audits, undocumented customization mapping, integration repair, and stabilization, not net-new implementation.
How is an outsourced PMO different from the platform vendor's project manager?
The platform vendor's PM works for the vendor. The Outsourced PMO works for you. We sit on your side of the table, hold the vendor accountable to scope and timeline, audit deliverables against your business requirements, and translate between the vendor's methodology and your internal stakeholders. The model is most useful when the vendor is delivering, and you need internal governance, but you do not have the headcount to build.
 What is zConnect, and how is it different from off-the-shelf iPaaS like Boomi, Workato, or Mulesoft?
zConnect is our proprietary integration platform, built specifically for the integrations between the platforms our clients actually run: NetSuite, Coupa, Adaptive, Rillet, Campfire, Salesforce, and the modern finance stack. Off-the-shelf iPaaS tools are powerful and require significant configuration expertise. zConnect packages that expertise into pre-built connectors and architectures, supported by the same team that delivered your platform implementation. For complex enterprise integrations outside our standard set, we also implement and support Boomi, Workato, and similar platforms.
Can you handle implementation and integration as a single engagement?
Yes, and this is most of what we do. The most common implementation failure mode is two vendors covering their own products, with neither covering the integration. Delivering both under a single contract is structurally how we close that gap. The engagement scopes the platform implementation and the integration build as discrete fixed-fee phases inside one project.
What does this cost?
Implementation pricing varies by platform, scope, and integration complexity. NetSuite implementations typically range from $150K to $750K, depending on scope and OneWorld requirements. Coupa implementations typically range from $200K to $1M, depending on module count and integration depth. Rillet and Campfire implementations are smaller in scope by platform design. Integration builds via zConnect are fixed-fee per connection. We can model TCO for your specific scope during the fit assessment.
Do you work with companies on an IPO track?
Yes. We have supported 80+ IPOs across multiple industries. The IPO-track work involves SOX readiness, audit-ready configuration, OneWorld consolidation, intercompany discipline, and the controls auditors will test. We have run this for both pre-IPO and S-1-stage companies.
Will the same team that sells the project deliver it?
Yes. There is no handoff between sales and delivery. The senior consultants on the assessment call are the same team in the kickoff and the same team at cutover. This is operationally expensive for us and is one of the reasons we do not run thin-margin price-per-hour engagements.
Start the Conversation

Talk To An Implementation Advisor. Not A Sales Rep

Thirty minutes, no pitch deck. We'll ask about your current platforms, the specific gap or project that brought you here, and the integration layer between them. We will tell you honestly whether you need an implementation, a rescue, a PMO, an integration build, or none of the above.